G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post links to your Project Three websites for discussion and feedback.

Maybe....

I ate something for lunch
0
No votes
I'll go home....
0
No votes
I'll play a video game
0
No votes
I'll just sit and stare blankly.
1
100%
 
Total votes: 1

User avatar
aznpandaaa
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:29 pm

G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by aznpandaaa »

Alright peeps, last but not least Project three. For the first design, I tried simplifying the site a bit more and provide a clean layout to easily navigate through.
rough1.jpg
page
rough1page.jpg

For the second, I tried adding a bit more of a design for visual interest, but still easy to navigate through.
rough2.jpg
page
rough2page.jpg
Last edited by aznpandaaa on Thu May 01, 2014 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage
Aljen Manuzon (AJ) ^______^v

mccuske2
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:29 pm

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by mccuske2 »

Like the second post It's a nice read
~*~ Tammy McCusker ~*~

User avatar
tehgrimza
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:29 pm

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by tehgrimza »

I like the 2nd style overall, the 1st one I get the feeling of a 8-bit game.

2nd one could use some more color though, perhaps try using colors from the GRC department website, and incorporate those into the site?
Image

c.j.jackson775
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:18 pm
Contact:

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by c.j.jackson775 »

None of these are really saying graphic communications to me. They are rather techy looking almost like an information systems. The link placement on the side of the logo is cool. I think overall there needs to be more color and more imagery.
Image That about sums it up!! --Chris Jackson

AWilburn
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:33 pm

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by AWilburn »

The 2nd one works better, but I would reconsider the GRC logo and the body copy.
Allen Wilburn.

User avatar
wbenavente
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:32 pm

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by wbenavente »

I think second design works better. Adding more photographs to give an idea what kind of program you're selling would be a plus too.
Image
Whinona Benavente - GRC 175
“Talent is a pursued interest. Anything that you're willing to practice, you can do.” - Bob Ross

User avatar
Instructor
Site Admin
Posts: 1943
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:51 am

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by Instructor »

Both designs seem to have the same strengths and weaknesses to me. I slightly prefer the second one, but both could easily be used with a little tweaking.

I like a lot about your designs. The strong contrast is really bold and grabs your attention. I also like the diagonal navigation on both. I think it really breaks out of the mold. I prefer the two column text layout of your second design to the single column on your first layout. I also like the smaller TMCC logo on the second one as well.

My issues with both come down to three things:

1. Fonts - There's too many of 'em and they clash. Pick two, a headline font and a bodycopy font and build your design with just those two. Might I suggest Impact for your headline font and Helvetica for your bodycopy font?

2. Colors - There's not enough of them. The blue you have on the second design is too dark and vanishes against the black background (loose the glow while you're at it). On a high contrast black and white design like these, a little color goes a long way. Might I suggest three or four accent colors used sparingly? Like say, RGB or CMYK.

3 Pictures - I don't see where pictures will go in these designs. Since most of your target audience are visual learners and visually oriented. You need lots of pictures. A picture is worth a thousand words.

I think you have a strong start. Time to tweak the crap out of it!
"Inspiration is for amateurs. The rest of us just show up and get to work." — Chuck Close

Michael Ganschow-Green - GRC 175 Instructor
mganschow@tmcc.edu | 673-8200 ext.5-2173

eric_sallender
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:29 pm

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by eric_sallender »

I'd go with the second one and enlarge your nav bar. I honestly couldn't tell if you had one for a few seconds because your typefaces are too similar in size. Great start though :D
^.^~Eric Sallender~^.^

elizabeth_mejia
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:51 am

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by elizabeth_mejia »

I am really liking the second design. It has that neat glow stick affect to the type I like it. It's neat where you placed the buttons as well to the side of the TMCC mountain looks good. My suggestion would be to maybe add some images of TMCC next to some of the type so these is not too much text.
-Elizabeth Mejia-

Image

User avatar
charliepecot
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:38 pm
Location: Sparks, NV
Contact:

Re: G. R. to the WHAT WHAT C.... lol.

Post by charliepecot »

No.2. Needs brighter colors to contrast against the black background.
Image

If all the world's a stage, then I want my SAG fees back.

Locked