prelim critique
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:48 pm
Hey everyone! I created 2 different design roughs and I would like to see what you thought. I didn't do a logo. I did move stuff around based on where I thought it looked good in the mobile version vs computer version. I also stuck with one font for both websites, though I did a little bit of changing in tracking/leading or changing in bold/normal/fine versions of the same font.
In one version, I was very much thinking of gardening. It's almost spring! I was trying for greens, purples,and some blues (analogous color scheme) in background images and text. One of the major issues I had was no matter what I did with text effects on images, even with the opaque background boxes, it usually made things look worse. I know in all 4 designs, I could have used more effects. I wanted a fun, but soothing, relaxing, outdoorsy look. I went with a mostly sans serif font, with a little bit of script flair to give it a little visual interest, but not mess up the legibility too badly.
In the other version, I wanted more of a bold solid background. I was still feeling purple so that's what I chose. I continued with green text (going more for a complimentary harmony). I included some geometric shapes to break up the monotonous background and add a little interest. I toned it down to 15% opacity though, because at high opacity, it could be distracting. I was trying to use the flow of the triangle lines to help the eye flow through the piece.
One of the things that bothered me was that it seemed, per the instructions, like we need to have all the information on the same screen. I personally wanted to break it up onto multiple pages to let the text breath, especially on the mobile versions.
A lot of the sites I visited were winners in web design for year 2018. However, when I went back to find those sites again, the google ad suggestions were unreal and I couldn't find some of the really cool sites. There were some cool examples of breaking out of the traditional models by layering images in odd ways. I also liked the tri-image layout I found (which was fairly bland, but still interesting) which is where I got the idea for the my first draft. I spent a lot of time looking at sites that were held up as doing good and sites on some of the newer trends.
In one version, I was very much thinking of gardening. It's almost spring! I was trying for greens, purples,and some blues (analogous color scheme) in background images and text. One of the major issues I had was no matter what I did with text effects on images, even with the opaque background boxes, it usually made things look worse. I know in all 4 designs, I could have used more effects. I wanted a fun, but soothing, relaxing, outdoorsy look. I went with a mostly sans serif font, with a little bit of script flair to give it a little visual interest, but not mess up the legibility too badly.
In the other version, I wanted more of a bold solid background. I was still feeling purple so that's what I chose. I continued with green text (going more for a complimentary harmony). I included some geometric shapes to break up the monotonous background and add a little interest. I toned it down to 15% opacity though, because at high opacity, it could be distracting. I was trying to use the flow of the triangle lines to help the eye flow through the piece.
One of the things that bothered me was that it seemed, per the instructions, like we need to have all the information on the same screen. I personally wanted to break it up onto multiple pages to let the text breath, especially on the mobile versions.
A lot of the sites I visited were winners in web design for year 2018. However, when I went back to find those sites again, the google ad suggestions were unreal and I couldn't find some of the really cool sites. There were some cool examples of breaking out of the traditional models by layering images in odd ways. I also liked the tri-image layout I found (which was fairly bland, but still interesting) which is where I got the idea for the my first draft. I spent a lot of time looking at sites that were held up as doing good and sites on some of the newer trends.